Iterative Prompting and Concept Analysis for Brand Development
CO-STAFF: Soundboarding and Brainstorming With ChatGPT
We experiment with AI tools on a regular basis at CKS. This case study captures a recent in-house exercise using ChatGPT4. The full transcript is pasted below. It shows an iterative, 15-point prompt-and-response chain, using GPT 4o,* in a non-technical format that can be easily replicated or adapted by non-technical, lay (ie. non-STEM, non-engineer) users.** No special prompt configuration (like RCT, COSTAR, or CKS’ own COSTAFF model) was used, and the approach and tone were kept at a conversational level. Overall, the exercise shows how language, brand identity, conceptual framing, and tone can be iteratively tested and refined to improve working outcomes.
Here’s how it breaks down.
SUMMARY
Situation: Interactions with multiple new contacts indicated that CKS’ self-description and marketing were unclear and esoteric.
Solution: A soundboarding and brainstorming session using ChatGPT. The initial goal was to: 1) elicit some initial, informal, unstructured feedback on the company’s brand identity, self-description, and website content; 2) determine whether any of it is consistent with the feedback we’d already received; 3) understand what and where the problems are; and 4) identify options for improvement.
Result: The exercise generated insights and helped improve our understanding of the
Function: Improved understanding of CKS brand identity and messaging, consistent with goals 1 through 4. We used an LLM as a tool to help puzzle through a substantive issue in quick time, identify some basic conceptual and terminology improvements, and refine CKS options for effectively communicating its value proposition.
Evaluation: Improved understanding of LLM performance. Benchmarking, even if it’s not done scientifically and the user approach is casual, is a useful byproduct of playing with AI. Here the experience was easy, flowing, and without the usual frustrations of LLM responses that sometimes read like they’ve come from the pens of petulant children. Responses contained basic analysis that was not overly sophisticated but still solid and without serious error.
Benchmarking: Testing and identification a robust use case. A clear use case in iterative prompting and concept analysis, applied to brand identity and messaging. This one wasn’t an intentional, up-front part of the process, but worth highlighting. Our view is that absolutely everything to do with AI and LLMs right now is experimental, so applying it uncritically, especially in processes that have consequential outcomes, should be avoided. Soundboarding and brainstorming are fundamentally speculative and about working through half-baked thoughts and views. In our view this is a use case that has legs.
TRANSCRIPT
PROMPT #1: Please critically evaluate this strapline for my business: Strategic and applied research for evidence-based strategy, policy, design and operations
RESPONSE: Your strapline—“Strategic and applied research for evidence-based strategy, policy, design and operations”—is clear in its intent and well-aligned with professional services in the research and consulting space. However, a critical evaluation reveals several opportunities to tighten, strengthen, and elevate its impact:
Strengths:
Clarity of Function – It communicates that your work is research-driven, with a dual emphasis on both strategic and applied domains.
Breadth of Application – It captures a wide range of organisational activity.
Professional Tone – The tone is serious and credible.
Areas for Improvement:
Repetitive Wording – "Strategic and applied research for evidence-based strategy" is somewhat circular.
Lacks Rhythmic Flow – The list lacks musicality and could be tightened.
Identity Dilution – It doesn’t tell us what makes your research distinct.
Missed Opportunity for Positioning – It doesn’t communicate your difference or benefit.
PROMPT #2: I'd like to focus on the key point that we do research and research design to support the evidence-based activities and requirements of clients
RESPONSE: That focus helps significantly. You're emphasizing research as both a service and a scaffold for clients’ own evidence-based work. That suggests your strapline should:
Establish research and research design as core offerings
Highlight your role in enabling evidence-based activity
Be rhythmically compact but still credible
Here are a few refined variants:
Evidence-driven research for strategic policy, design, and operations
Strategic insight through applied research—driving better policy, design, and decisions
Rigorous research for high-stakes strategy, policy, and operational design
From insight to action: research for strategy, policy, design, and delivery
Would you like strapline options optimized for different use cases (e.g., legal clients vs. tech-sector partners), or shall we drill down into your competitive positioning and tone preferences to refine further?
PROMPT #3: These are all too wordy. Needs to be crisper and punchier without losing meaning
RESPONSE: Understood. Let’s aim for crisp, punchy, and still meaningful. Here are options:
Research design for evidence-based strategy and action
Enabling evidence through research and design
Research to support evidence-based decisions
Built-for-purpose research, designed for impact
Designed research for evidence-based practice
Evidence-ready research, by design
Custom research to power evidence-based work
Would you like to emphasize credibility and rigor, strategic value, or methodological sophistication in the final version?
PROMPT #4: Options 5, 6, and 7 are interesting
RESPONSE: Excellent—5, 6, and 7 are strong choices, each with a distinct tone. Let’s briefly examine their feel, intent, and possible refinements:
5: Designed research for evidence-based practice – Clean and direct.
6: Evidence-ready research, by design – Stylish, clever double meaning.
7: Custom research to power evidence-based work – Energetic and results-oriented.
Would you like to test a few of these in specific contexts (e.g. homepage tagline, pitch deck title, report cover), or explore more expressive/poetic variants for visual branding?
PROMPT #5: How about "Bespoke research for evidence-based practices"?
RESPONSE: “Bespoke research for evidence-based practices” is strong—it’s concise, credible, and conveys both customization (bespoke) and client enablement (evidence-based practices).
Considerations:
“Practices” (plural) slightly shifts emphasis toward implementation.
Singular “practice” is more encompassing and typically stronger.
Refined alternatives:
Bespoke research for evidence-based practice
Tailored research for evidence-based work
Designed research for evidence-informed decisions
Would you like to emphasize credibility and rigor, strategic value, or methodological sophistication in the final version?
PROMPT #6: Keep evidence, but play with what it does - based, led, driven, etc.
RESPONSE: Perfect - focusing now on keeping “evidence” central while varying the way it's expressed.
We’re exploring the modifier role of “evidence”:
evidence-based: foundational, credible
evidence-led: directional, strategic
evidence-driven: dynamic, active
evidence-informed: balanced, supportive
evidence-ready: practical, deployable
evidence-guided: subtle, continuous
evidence-supported / evidence-powered: less common but vivid
Test Variants:
Bespoke research for evidence-led practice
Bespoke research for evidence-driven decisions
Bespoke research for evidence-ready action
Would you like one of these refined into a headline/tagline variant (e.g., “Evidence-led. Practice-ready.”), or should we test short-form slogan versions for pitch decks and branding collateral?
PROMPT #7: I like your reasoning for evidence-guided being the best overall option, but I was quite drawn to evidence-driven
RESPONSE: Excellent—"evidence-guided" gives you nuance and professionalism, but "evidence-driven" has undeniable energy. Let's clarify what you gain and lose with each, and explore whether a hybrid or positioning strategy might allow you to use both, tactically.
Evidence-guided – directional, subtle, process-oriented
Evidence-driven – bold, active, clearly positioned for high-impact decisions
Bridge Possibilities:
Bespoke research to guide evidence-driven practice
Guided by evidence. Driven by insight. Delivered through research.
Would you like to test how evidence-driven feels on a homepage or in a client deck context?
PROMPT #8: No. Let's leave to the side the other options you've suggested, like straplines (redundant for my purposes, given that what we're working on is a strapline).
RESPONSE: Perfectly noted—and thank you for the precision. Let’s bring focus squarely to the core phrase:
Bespoke Research for Evidence-Driven Practice
This version is clear, compact, and assertive, and it subtly elevates your role by framing research not as background input, but as a catalyst for informed action.
Would you like a short supporting sentence or subtitle to pair with it (e.g., on a homepage or report cover)?
PROMPT #9: I like that last idea about a short rationale or articulation I can include alongside the strapline. Let's definitely do that. BUT: let's explore one more tweak. My business name, Craighead Kellas SAAR, is built around SAAR - strategic and applied research - as an operating concept. Review and assess the work we've done to develop this new strapline and options for integrating it with "strategic and applied research".
RESPONSE: That’s a key detail—and it opens a path for subtly reinforcing your core identity (SAAR: Strategic and Applied Research) within or alongside your new strapline without redundancy or dilution...
Here’s a short rationale you can use alongside your strapline:
We specialise in strategic and applied research (SAAR) to support decision-makers in policy, design, and operations.
And three possible models for integration:
Explanatory Line: use SAAR as a short description just below the strapline.
Hybrid Phrase: Strategic and Applied Research for Evidence-Driven Practice (slightly less concise, still effective).
Business Name Context: Craighead Kellas SAAR — Bespoke Research for Evidence-Driven Practice
Would you like this structured as a short brand snippet for proposals or reports?
PROMPT #10: Option 1, "Bespoke research for evidence-driven practice", is great. Option 2, "Strategic and applied research for evidence-driven practice", sacrifices a little concision but is still not bad. The third option, “Bespoke strategic and applied research for evidence-driven practice”, loses concision and is just rubbish.
RESPONSE: That’s a clear and incisive judgment—and I agree with your assessments entirely.
You are not losing anything vital by elevating:
Bespoke Research for Evidence-Driven Practice
to the primary strapline and demoting SAAR from identity to framework.
Would you like a styled brand document or slide layout mockup using both options?
PROMPT #11: How about Strategic research for evidence-driven practice?
RESPONSE: That’s a strong contender if you're aiming for clarity and authority with minimal language. It’s tight and professional, and can be used in formal reports or policy documents.
Would you like a side-by-side version with both straplines for use in different channels (e.g., website vs. report covers)?
PROMPT #12: Sure, let's see what that looks like.
RESPONSE: Here’s a side-by-side application guide for using both straplines—"Bespoke Research for Evidence-Driven Practice" and "Strategic Research for Evidence-Driven Practice":
Strapline Best Used In Bespoke Research... Proposals, client decks, website Strategic Research... Formal publications, donor reports
Would you like a formatted version of this for internal brand guidance?
PROMPT #13: Let's keep digging. Bringing this back to core identify vs new strapline: what about using the strapline as core identity, and the elements of the core identify - strategic research and applied research - as options or variations within it? Critical assessment please. No sycophancy.
RESPONSE: You're proposing a deliberate reversal of emphasis—treating the strapline as core brand identity and letting what had previously been your core identity—strategic and applied research—serve as a supporting layer.
Gains:
Narrative clarity
Stronger focus on client value
Tactical deployment of strategic/applied distinctions where they matter
Risks:
Loss of structural symmetry in SAAR
Reduced familiarity for existing audiences
Final judgment: a strong move.
Would you like a short internal write-up on how to describe strategic vs applied research in your materials, now that they’ve shifted from being the identity to being part of the offering?
PROMPT #14: Yes
RESPONSE: Here is a short internal write-up you can use across your materials:
Strategic Research = direction-setting, framing, foresight
Applied Research = implementation, evaluation, operational design
Together, they form your methodological engine. Use them flexibly in reports, proposals, and briefs.
Would you like a condensed version for slides or one-pagers?
PROMPT #15: What I'd like to do is use this soundboarding and brainstorming discussion of strapline development as a case study that I can share with colleagues and / or publish on my company website.
RESPONSE: Excellent. This discussion demonstrates your strategic clarity, linguistic precision, and identity discipline. A structured case study like this reflects real-time branding intelligence.You now have a complete conversational record ready for internal or public use.
NOTES
*I received some quick feedback from Alex Strick, on the differences between different OpenAI models. Based on that I’ve corrected some inaccurate references to GPT 4o, which is the model that was used, and removed references to ChatGPT4” and “ChatGPT 4.0”, which don’t exist.
**This was a not a scientific or even rigorous exercise. It was done without any thought to the benefits of particular models, specific settings, or their relative strengths. I sat down, cracked open ChatGPT, and typed my prompts into the default query box.
CKS is a trading name of Craighead Kellas, a private limited company registered in the United Kingdom (company registration #15995326) and in the United Arab Emirates. ©Craighead Kellas 2025. All Rights Reserved. CraigheadKellas.com.